Difference between revisions of "EndNote Web"

Zotero, Mendeley & Endnote are top three tools
...RefWorks is 4th

To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index.

[edit] Last Update

• 16 February 2018

[edit] Introduction

See also Cloud computing | Mendeley | Quosa | RefWorks | Zotero | Zotero vs. Mendeley

EndNote™ online, formerly EndNote Web, is a free version of EndNote made available to institutions that subscribe to Thomson Reuter's scientific databases. EndNote works in a similar way to RefWorks, Mendeley and Zotero but there are differences. First there are different ways to add citations to Endnote: manually, exporting, importing, and connecting from within EndNote (e.g., PubMed and Web of Science). Academic librarians who promote and provide technical support for citation management programs should be aware of the strengths and potential problems that users will face in using EndNote Web. Until recently, PubMed references had to be saved as text files and then imported into EndNote. Now, automatic exporting of PubMed citations is possible using Internet Explorer (IE) or Mozilla Firefox. Endnote Web includes features such as the ability to sort references by times cited, by date added to the library, and by date modified. You can transfer up to 10,000 references between the web and EndNote on the desktop.

Endnote Web X8 is capable of exporting citations in plain text, Rich Text Format, HTML or XML. The current version has networking capabilities, and files can be stored in the cloud on a central server. Endnote X8 does not have multi-user capabilities for editing single bibliographic files. Endnote X8 for Windows is available as of 2017.

[edit] What is EndNote?

• Endnote Web X8 is a web and "cloud"-based program that allows you to import, export, store, edit, and manage your citations
• Citations from many databases can be imported using your online account directly or via saved text files
• Works with Microsoft Word (use free Cite While You Write plug-in); create in-text citations and bibliographies in many citation styles
• Allows online sharing of EndNote Web folders of citations with others for collaborative projects

[edit] Pros & cons

• EndNote is heavily used in the sciences, and stores up to 10,000 citations; EndNote is compatible with Windows and Macintosh computers and is arguably as powerful as RefWorks
• According to Henseley (2011), "...EndNote allows the user to save search strategies, going a long way in assisting researchers with keeping a research log..."
• A good citation management tool should make it easy to import citations into a centrally-located, web-accessible space. It should make it easy to read and record the data elements (e.g., metadata) for the citation such as author name, year of publication, title of article and so on. The tool should provide ways to help you find and retrieve citations on the fly, and it should produce a good bibliography in a format prescribed by users.
• Most academics find that EndNote does what they need: to organize references into a personal database or library.
• Cite While You Write helps scholars make correct in-text citations and will generate a reference list / bibliography at the end of a paper
• graduate students and researchers find that EndNote Web is a perfect companion to EndNote Desktop; with the former, you have the freedom to do research away from your desktop and store references in folders (or libraries). Folders can be moved back and forth between the two products and other bibliographic management systems.
• EndNote Web and the Web of Knowledge (including Web of Science) are designed to work together
• However, users of EndNote Web should be aware that folders are stored on an American server

[edit] References

• Butros A, Taylor S. Managing information: evaluating and selecting citation management software, a look at EndNote, RefWorks, Mendeley and Zotero. IAMSLIC Conf Proc, 2010.
• Brahmi FA, Gall C. EndNote and Reference Manager Citation formats compared to "instructions to authors" in top medical journals. Med Ref Serv Q. 2006 Summer;25(2):49–57.
• Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, Holland L, Bekhuis T. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3.
• Childress D. Citation tools in academic libraries: best practices for reference and instruction. Ref User Serv Q. 2011;51(2):143-152.
• Fitzgibbons M, Meert D. Are bibliographic management software search interfaces reliable? A comparison between search results obtained using database interfaces and the EndNote online search function. J Acad Libr. 2010;36(2):144–150.
• Fourie I. Personal information and reference management: librarians' increasing creativity. Library Hi Tech. 2011;29(2):387–93.
• Gall C, Brahmi FA. Retrieval comparison of EndNote to search MEDLINE (Ovid and PubMed) versus searching them directly. Med Ref Serv Q. 2004 Fall;23(3):25–32.
• Gomis M, Gall C, Brahmi FA. Web-based citation management compared to EndNote: options for medical sciences. Med Ref Serv Q. 2008 Fall;27(3):260–71.
• Hensley MK. Citation management software: features and futures. Ref User Serv Q. 2011;50(3):204–8.
• Herbert TL. EndNote 5 for windows. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2002 Jan-Feb;42(1):134–5.
• Kali A, Srirangaraj S. EndNote as document manager for summative assessment. J Postgrad Med. 2016 Jan 15.
• Kratochvíl J. Comparison of the accuracy of bibliographical references generated for medical citation styles by EndNote, Mendeley, RefWorks and Zotero. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2017 Jan 1;43(1):57-66.
• London S, Gurdal O, Gall C. Automatic export of PubMed citations to EndNote. Med Ref Serv Q. 2010;29(2):146–53.
• Lo Russo G, Spolveri F, Ciancio F, Mori A. Mendeley: an easy way to manage, share, and synchronize papers and citations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jun;131(6):946e-947e.
• Mahajan AK, Hogarth DK. Taking control of your digital library: how modern citation managers do more than just referencing. Chest. 2013;144(6):1930-3.
• Priem J, Hemminger B. Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web. First Monday. 2010;15(7).
• Reiss M, Reiss G. EndNote 5 reference manager--functions--improvements--personal experiences. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2002 Oct 2;91(40):1645–50.
• Steeleworthy M, Dewan PT. Web-based citation management systems: which one is best?. Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research. 2013;8(1).
• Zhang Y. Comparison of select reference management tools. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31(1):45–60.