Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI International? contact Research bearing torch of knowledge (1896) by Warner
To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index.
This entry is out of date, and will not be updated, June 2017
See also Altmetrics | Hand-searching | Structured abstract | Research Portal for Academic Librarians | Systematic narrative review methods
Research skills are required for work in biomedicine, and all medical librarians are required to be aware of the competencies and skills needed for active participation in helping others to carry out research. In addition, medical librarians are expected to have adequate knowledge of the health sciences environment including medical terminology and concepts. Sound knowledge of certain competencies for medical libraries is an additional requirement for library personnel.
- Basic understanding of research methodologies (both quantitative and qualitative)
- Knowledge and application of citation styles and reference managers (i.e, RefWorks, Zotero & Mendeley)
- Ability to use research tools such as questionnaires, focus groups and interviews
- Ability to write research reports
- Analysis, evaluation and application of research results
- Knowledge and application of data analysis software (SPSS, Instate etc)
- Basic knowledge of descriptive and inferential statistics
In 2014, health librarians play key roles in the creation of systematic reviews.
- Ashcroft L, McIvor S. LIS research and publishing: the forces of change. Library Review. 2000;49(9):461-469.
- Association of College and Research Libraries Task Force on Institutional Priorities and Faculty Rewards. Academic librarianship and the redefining scholarship project.
- Bayley L, Eldredge J. The structured abstract: an essential tool for (beginner) researchers. Hypothesis. 2003;17(1):11-13.
- Beck SE, Manuel K. Practical research methods for librarians and information professionals. New York: Neal-Schuman; 2008.
- Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1997.
- Bruce C. Faculty-librarian partnerships in Australian higher education: Critical dimensions. Ref Serv Rev. 2001;29(2):106-116.
- Christiansen L, Stombler M, Thaxton L. A report on librarian-faculty relations from a sociological perspective. J Acad Librarianship. 2004;30(2):116-121.
- Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Books, 2012.
- Fallon H. And so it is written: supporting librarians on the path to publication. J Library Innovation. 2010;1(1).
- Fraser Health. Clinical Research Professional Development Team Handbook; 2009
- Gerding SK, MacKellar PH. Grants for libraries: a how-to-do-it manual. New York: Neal-Schuman, 2006.
- Given LM. SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications, 2008.
- Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108.
- Hernon P, Schwartz C. Leadership: developing a research agenda for academic libraries. Libr Info Sci Res. 2008;30(4):243-249.
- Iverson L. Report on eLibrary@UBC 4: Research, collaboration and the digital library - visions for 2010. D-Lib Magazine. 2002;8(12).
- Lougee WP. Diffuse libraries: emergent roles for the research library in the digital age. Perspectives on the evolving library. District of Columbia: Council on Library and Information Resources; 2002.
- Luo L, Wildemuth BM. Delphi studies. In: Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited; 2002.
- Medical Library Association. Role of expert searching in health sciences libraries. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93(1):42–4.
- McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93(1):44.–80.
- Neal JG. The research and development imperative in the academic library: Path to the future. Portal. 2006;6(1):1-3.
- Powell RR, Connaway LS. Basic research methods for librarians (4e). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004. (see 1997 copy)
- Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system forappraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative,quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46(4):529-46.
- St Clair G, Miller R, Fiander PM. Academic librarianship and the redefining scholarship project. Serials Librarian. 2000;38(1/2):63-67.
- Stelle V, Elder SD. Becoming a fundraiser : the principles and practice of library development. Chicago: American Library Association; 2000.
- Swetman D. Writing your dissertation: how to plan, prepare and present successful work. How To Books Ltd, 2001.
- University of Toronto. Writing in the Health Sciences: a comprehensive guide, 2009.
- Wildemuth BM. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited; 2009.
- Wisker G. The postgraduate research handbook: succeed with Your MA, MPhil, EdD and PhD. Open University Press, 2001.