|Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI International? contact
To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index.
- 7 March 2016
See also Evidence-based health care | Expert searching | Literature search standards | Systematic review searching | Systematic narrative review methods | The role of health librarians in systematic reviews
High-quality systematic and literature reviews should accurately document all steps of their search process using clear language. Resulting documentation should provide detail such that any knowledgeable librarian or reader could reproduce the searches for a given review. The quality of any report or research should be assessed based on its merits but including the search. Too often the information researchers report in published papers does not adequately reflect the search process that librarians and information retrievalists go through. The reporting standards are meant to address this issue.
Atkinson et al (2015) say that ...a complete description of the literature search, including the criteria used for the inclusion of reports after they have been located, used in a research synthesis or meta-analysis is critical if subsequent researchers are to accurately evaluate and reproduce a synthesis' methods and results. Atkinson et al present focused and detailed standards for reporting the methods used in a literature search. Their guidelines cover five search strategies: reference database searches, journal and bibliography searches, searches of the reference lists of reports, citation searches and direct contact searches. They collate unique recommendations made in existing guidelines for research synthesis, and identify gaps in reporting standards for search strategies. Finally they address gaps by providing new reporting recommendations.
Guides and Standards for Conducting Systematic Reviews
Reporting Standards and Checklists
- CONSORT - an evidence-based, minimum set of recommendations for reporting RCTs. It offers a standard way for authors to prepare reports of trial findings, facilitating their complete and transparent reporting, and aiding their critical appraisal and interpretation.
- EQUATOR - links to a number of reporting standards. Is an international initiative that seeks to enhance reliability and value of medical research literature by promoting transparent and accurate reporting of research studies.
- MOOSE - a checklist summarizing recommendations for reporting meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology.
- PRISMA - (Formerly QUOROM) provides an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. It includes a 27-item checklist and a four-phase flow diagram.
- STARD - A checklist and a generic flow diagram for studies of diagnostic accuracy.
- STARLITE - standards for reporting literature searches.
- STROBE - an international collaborative initiative that aims to strengthen the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology.
- TREND - developed to guide standardized reporting of nonrandomized controlled trials.
- Boeker M, Motschall E, Vach W. Literature search methodology for systematic reviews: conventional and natural language processing enabled methods are complementary. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun 3. pii: S0895-4356(15)00266-8.
- Atkinson KM, Koenka AC, Sanchez CE, Moshontz H, Cooper H. Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate. Res Synth Methods. 2015 Mar;6(1):87-95.
- Booth A. "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literaturesearches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Oct;94(4):421-9, e205.
- Jesson J, Matheson L, Lacey FM. Doing your literature review: traditional and systematic techniques. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2011.
- Bethel A, Rogers M. A checklist to assess database-hosting platforms for designing and running searches for systematic reviews. Health Info Libr J. 2014;31:43-53.
- Craven J et al. A comparison of searching the Cochrane library databases via CRD, Ovid and Wiley: implications for systematic searching and information services. Health Info Libr J. 2014;31:54-63.
- Hausner E, Waffenschmidt S. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: further issues regarding the objective and conceptual approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun 3. pii: S0895-4356(15)00265-6.
- Ballantyne Scott B, et al. 2015: The need for standards for literature searching in health libraries. CHLA/ABSC Conference, 2015. Vancouver BC.
- Bates M. Rigorous systematic bibliography. RQ, 1976;16:7-26.
- Bates MJ. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review. 1989;13(5):407–424.
- Bates MJ. Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Info Process Managem. 1990;26:575–591.
- Bates MJ. The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface. Info Process Managem. 2002;38:381–400.
- Booth A, Papaioannou D,& Sutton A. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. London: Sage, 2012.
- Carter D, Janes J. Unobtrusive data analysis of digital reference questions and service at the Internet public library: An exploratory study. Library Trends. 2000;49(2):251-265.
- Cochrane Collaboration. Chapter 6: searching for studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. http://handbook.cochrane.org
- Frazier JJ, Stein CD, Tseytlin E, Bekhuis T. Building a gold standard to construct search filters: a case study with biomarkers for oral cancer. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jan;103(1):22-30.
- Geschwandtner M, Kritz M, Boyer C. Requirements of the health professional search. Technical report, Khresmoi Project, August 2011.
- Kohn A, Bry F, Manta A, Ifenthaler D. Professional search: requirements, prototype and preliminary experience report. In: IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet, 2008;195–202.
- Lyon JA, Garcia-Milian R, Norton HF, Tennant MR. The use of Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software to create a database of librarian-mediated literature searches. Med Ref Serv Q. 2014;33(3):241-5.
- McGowan J, Sampson M, Lefebvre C. An evidence based checklist for the peer review of electronic search strategies (PRESS EBC). Evidence Based Library And Information Practice. 2010;5(1):149-154.
- Rethlefsen ML, Murad MH, Livingston EH. Engaging medical librarians to improve the quality of review articles. JAMA. 2014; 312(10):999-1000.