Point of care evaluation criteria

From HLWIKI Canada

Jump to: navigation, search
Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI Canada - hlwiki.ca? contact: dean.giustini@ubc.ca

To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the wiki index.

Contents

Introduction

See files of information on point-of-care tools - overview.

Dealbreakers or key features

  • Decisions about which products to trial need to be made. To aid in narrowing down our list, please list factors that are "dealbreakers". Which deficiencies would make you cross a product off the list, or conversely, which factors are overwhelmingly important to you? Frequency of update? Inclusion of drug info? Clear references?

Possible evaluation questions

CONTENT & FEATURES

  1. Does it provide general knowledge about a condition, for example "diabetes"?
  2. Are topics limited or comprehensive in their coverage?
  3. Does it link to textbooks?
  4. Does it provide specific information to answer a foreground PICO question?
  5. Are patient handouts included in the product?
  6. Are CE credits available?
  7. Are practice guidelines included?
  8. Is there a separate drug search component?
  9. Are medical calculators/tools included?
  10. Are links to PubMed provided?
  11. Are ICD-9 codes included?
  12. Is there a differential diagnosis feature?
  13. Is it possible to set up email or PDA alerts?
  14. Does it fulfill a need not addressed elsewhere?

AUDIENCE

  1. Is the target audience family doctors or specialists?

CURRENCY

  1. How often is the information updated?
  2. Is medical news (daily? weekly?) reported on?
  3. Is the information date stamped?

AUTHORSHIP & AUTHORITY

  1. Are the authors of the information listed?
  2. Is there a peer review process?
  3. Is evidence grading indicated?
  4. Is there information on how the evidence is determined?
  5. Are references included?

PRESENTATION & FORMAT

  1. Can product easily be used on PDAs? or Apple iPhone for physicians
  2. Is the layout of the information helpful, for example are there sections and subsections that users can open and expand at will? (for example causes/complications/tests/differential diagnosis /drugs/prognosis/treatment/prevention/screening/patient information/references...)
  3. Is the conclusion of the topic presented at the beginning of the writeup?
  4. Is it easy to navigate?
  • With thanks to Memorial U's Health Sciences Library for sharing their evaluation questions

Possible "audience" categories

  • Academic - undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • Clinical
  • Subject specialties, e.g. pharmacy, medicine (+ subspecialties), nursing

Articles, etc. to peruse

Personal tools