Module II - Participation

From HLWIKI Canada

Jump to: navigation, search
Participating in a group of diverse professionals is enriching
Go back to: LIBR 559M - Social Media for Information Professionals - Online Modules

Contents

Learning objectives

After completing module II "Participation", you will be able to:

  • Discuss some of the challenges associated with using social media (sometimes called participatory media)
  • Compare some of the similarities and differences in offline and online acts of participation in information organizations
  • Enumerate some of the advantages and disadvantages of participation, and its impact on information professionals
    • i.e. outreach, collaboration, marketing; concerns around security, privacy, information overload
  • Discuss the concepts of digital identity, reputation and surveillance in information organizations when using 'participatory media'

Activities

To begin your exploration of concepts in module II, complete the following:

Week I

Scavenger hunt for various uses of 2.0 suffix

    • Since 2003 or so, the use of "2.0" as a suffix has been widely used and debated by information professionals
  • To acquaint yourself with some of this discussion, complete the Module II - Week I - Discovery exercise
    • Perform a few Google searches for 2.0 phrases such as:
    • Take a close look at the uses of the 2.0 suffix on these pages
    • Why is the 2.0 suffix so often used to convey 'innovation'? or a second generation 'improved' form of what came before?
    • Is the 2.0 suffix confusing, a trendy buzzword - or helpful?
    • In your study groups, find some examples of the use of 2.0 suffix in libraries, archives and museums
    • Do you think the 2.0 suffix is helpful, or not? Why not? Discuss whether you believe it is applied with any consistency in the information professions
    • Post some brief points (>300 words) outlining your discussion to the forum "The 2.0 suffix in information organizations: help or hindrance?"

Week II

  • Instructor's use of social media - watch presentation for Module II
  • Read Albrechtslund A. Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday. 2008;13:3.
  • In the discussion forum "The Downside of 2.0", you will have the opportunity to discuss some of these questions:
    • Should information professionals use social media?
      • based on where we work/what we do? (i.e. situated contexts) or use it to expand our network and perspectives globally? (See danah boyd's essay on global vs. local)
    • Online and offline participation for librarians and information professionals - is there a difference?
    • Is there a professional boundary limiting our online participation in tools such as Facebook or Wikipedia?
    • How will information professionals find that boundary? How do you think we can determine it for ourselves?
    • When you use social media are you monitored as in being watched (Panopticon metaphors of surveillance)
    • How are social technologies implicated in surveillance, post 9-11?
    • Examine extreme (ab)use of social media (i.e. Craiglist murder; Facebook taunting; criticism of employers resulting in firing)
  • Either in the social cafe or on your blog explore some of these questions, and what might be optimum in information organizations (there is no minimum or maximum posting)

Background

"To promote a more participatory society, it is important to promote participatory media and
to challenge, replace and eventually abandon mass media."
Brian Martin - University of Wollongong

"...participatory librarianship recasts library and library practice using the fundamental concept that knowledge is created through conversations."
Participatory Librarianship - http://ptbed.org/intro.php new2.gif (see Participatory Spaces)

The social web is an ecosystem of participation, where value is created by aggregating contributions made by individual users. In module II, we explore the concept of participation as it refers to engagement with evolving networks and taking part in online discussions and projects. A defining element of this emerging webspace is that as more participants use social media, the better and more diverse its channels of information become. Why some people are compelled to use information platforms such as Facebook and Twitter - and to participate in global conversations - is one part of understanding social media and its many affordances.

Historically, the culture of participation has its roots in democracy, socialism and civic responsibility. But more specifically, the most important and influential social tools are used for basic information dissemination and learning. Emerging online communities on the web are typically oriented toward sharing and creating new ideas in a continual loop of uptake, evaluation and refinement. Moreover, socially-mediated tools support broad-based participation in communities at a local level as well as across communities globally. Being social with web media is the access point to discovering a vast network of learning opportunities on the social web.

In the context of the information professions, participation evokes the idea of "getting involved" or assuming an active role as a participant in projects. Information professionals are ideally-situated to get involved in community events. Civic participation is often necessary in order to further the goals of communities and institutions. Due to the surge of interest in American politics during the 2008 election, some larger ideas associated with new forms of online media include government 2.0, cyber-democracy and e-participation.

Social media saturation

Social media is moving into our lives making even the banal not only amusing but potentially educational. However, keep in mind that one person's educational moment might be another's waste of time. What seems self-evident is that social media is not a fad, and it is firmly entrenched in 21st century culture as a major form of communication and socialization.

This will hardly come as a surprise to anyone in LIBR559M - but it bears repeating. Sending tweets, text messages, Facebook updates and e-mail connect us to an evolving network of friends and acquaintances. The Internet and the Web have opened up multiple channels (and networks) for instant access to people and expertise that in previous eras would have been impractical if not impossible.

Social media and what is broadcast can consequently be said to permeating even saturating our lives. Marshall McLuhan might say that "Social media is definitely the message". Newer interactive and participatory media (e.g., mobile phones, texting, blogging, etc.) have taken over some of our everyday practical activities. Media in this sense profoundly influence the quotidian, unstructured activities and conversation of modern life; as Sybille Krämer says "Everything we can say, find out and know about the world is being said, found out and known with the help of media" (Krämer 1998, p. 73).

In a report entitled Confronting the Challenges of the Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, one of the academic icons of media Henry Jenkins describes a number of applications characteristic of web 2.0 and how they are reflective of society as a whole. Rather than review each technology in isolation, he recommends an ecological approach and suggests thinking about the interrelationships between tools, cultural communities that grow up around them, and the activities they seek to support. Media systems consist of communication technologies and the social, cultural, legal, political, and economic institutions, practices, and protocols that shape and surround them. (Jenkins et al. 2006, p. 8)

Quotations - Participation, agentic action and learning

Dr. Wolff-Michael Roth and Stuart Lee of the University of Victoria assert that until the early 1990s the individual was the 'unit of instruction'. The two observed that researchers and practitioners switched to the idea that knowing is 'better' thought of as a cultural or communal practice. Roth and Lee also claim that this led to changes in learning and teaching design in which students were encouraged to share their ways of learning with each other. In other words, people take part in the construction of consensual domains and 'participate in the negotiation and institutionalization of meaning'. In effect, they are participating in learning communities.

The blogosphere can be deconstructed in a variety of ways: as alternative citizen journalism, as participatory media enabling citizens and activists to produce their own content, as a social platform to communicate with friends and family, and as a vehicle for airing (counter-hegemonic) viewpoints, but also as a propaganda instrument, a marketing tool, and a distribution channel.
- Paul Cammaerts, Critiques on the Participatory Potentials of Web 2.0

Associated memes

  • platform of participation; web as platform
  • participation as potential; first step towards self-efficacy; learning
  • affording the opportunity to belong to something larger than oneself
  • webcams, power and agency; Foucault's punishment; Bentham's Panopticon; Habermassian public sphere

Related concepts

  • getting involved; "a community is like a ship: everyone ought to be prepared to take the helm." - Henrik Ibsen
  • Freire's conscientization; exploring, monitoring, observing (being observed), surveillance

Bowling alone

Several years ago Robert Putnam captured the attention of many social scientists,policymakers, and community leaders with one simple observation: membership in bowlingleagues in the United States was declining (Cf., Putnam, 2000). Statistics showed that bowlingremained a very popular leisure activity. However, people were less inclined to participate inthe context of more or less formal voluntary associations we call leagues. When considered inisolation, this observation seems quite inconsequential. However, Putman and others haveskillfully linked it with data that show a steady and rather steep decline in American participationin voluntary associations generally for the past fifty years.

Final reflections

  1. Is there a culture of participation in libraries and what are its historical precedents?
  2. How are the terms 'community involvement' and 'participatory culture' relevant to libraries?
  3. How open and accessible is participation in libraries currently? How do we know? Who is excluded?
  4. What are the trends, and where do you think things are headed?
  5. What are the time management issues for information professionals
  6. What are the pros & cons of participation for information professionals - dangers? extremes?
  7. Is there a participatory or social media 'gender divide'?
  8. Explore one (or more) of these questions in the forums, Wimba classroom, on your blog or engage with someone in a forum with which you feel comfortable.

Websites

Other exploration


Personal tools