To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index.
This entry is out of date, and will not be updated, June 2017
There are many scenarios that could lead a legal researcher to do medical research. Examples include supporting plaintiffs’ attorneys or medical malpractice defense attorneys in a medical negligence case, supporting faculty doing research on health law issues, or supporting a legal clinic that fights for children with special needs. From a legal researcher’s perspective, medical literature is often needed for medical proof. Because the medical profession uses EBM to weigh the value of medical literature, legal professionals must apply the principles of EBM in order to apply the standards of proof to medical literature. The goal of EBM, to make decisions based on the best available medical evidence, parallels the goal of the legal system to make judicial decisions based upon the best evidence. Thus, EBM and the law correspond to each other. The clinician’s job of making the best clinical decision given the best available evidence is clearly aligned with the legal system’s job of making a fair decision given the evidence that comes closest to the truth.
"A number of factors distinguish online medical journal data (such as MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus) from legal research databases (LexisNexis and Westlaw); however, one major difference that could substantially improve the experience of users of medical journal databases is the adoption of a technique from legal research databases known as *shepardizing...*"
See also Medico-Legal Journal
How to Do a MEDLINE Search
Health law reference sources
The following sources provide good introductions to and overviews of health law.
A one volume hornbook summarizing basic principles of health law from regulation of health care institutions to end-of-life decisions. Also available as an expanded, two-volume practitioner treatise (KF3821 .H434 2000).
An introduction to the basic issues of health law from the American Health Lawyers Association.