Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI International? contact
To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index.
This entry is out of date, and will not be updated, June 2017
See also Evidence-based web 2.0 | Point of care decision-making tools - Overview | Systematic review searching
Health Services Research (HSR)
Health services research (HSR) examines how people get access to health care, how much care costs, and what happens to patients as a result of this care. The main goals of health services research are to identify the most effective ways to organize, manage, finance and deliver high-quality care; reduce medical errors; and improve patient safety.
- HSR is ...a field of inquiry that examines the impact of the organization, financing and management of health care services on the delivery, quality, cost, access to and outcomes of such services.
- Our research focuses on measuring quality of health care, evaluating approaches and policies for improving health care delivery, and analysing population health outcomes.
Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary field of policy analysis. It covers the medical, social, ethical and economic implications of development, diffusion and use of health technology. Health technology is defined as prevention and rehabilitation, vaccines, pharmaceuticals and devices, medical and surgical procedures, and the systems within which health is protected and maintained. ~ Cleemput, Van Den Bruel, Kohn, Vlayen, Vinck and Thiry et al, 2007
Also: ...the systematic evaluation of properties, effects, and/or impacts of health care technology. It may address the direct, intended consequences of technologies as well as their indirect, unintended consequences. Its main purpose is to inform technology-related policymaking in health care. HTA is conducted by interdisciplinary groups using explicit analytical frameworks drawing from a variety of methods. ~ National Information Center on Health Services Research and Health Care Technology (NICHSR)
- NLM contracted with AcademyHealth to define the scope of grey literature in health services research and policy. To better evaluate the grey literature, AcademyHealth convened a committee to identify and prioritize the relevant disciplines, subject areas and types of grey literature. To supplement the expertise of the committee, a small number of grey literature-producing organizations were contacted to determine their preservation policies and practices.
- Aghayev E, Henning J, Munting E, Diel P, Moulin P. Comparative effectiveness research across two spine registries. Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar 14.
- Avorn J. Debate about funding comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(19):1927-9.
- Bavington B. Core competencies for public health in Canada: an assessment and comparison of determinants of health content. St. Francis Xavier University. National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health (NCCDH), 2012.
- Braithwaite RS, Rosen AB. Linking cost sharing to value: an unrivaled yet unrealized public health opportunity. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(8):602-5.
- Cartwright N, Hardie J. Evidence-based policy: a practical guide to doing it better. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
- Chalkidou K, Tunis S, Lopert R, Rochaix L. Comparative effectiveness research and evidence-based health policy: experience from four countries. Milbank Q. 2009;87(2):339-67.
- Chou WY, Prestin A, Lyons C, Wen KY. Web 2.0 for health promotion: reviewing the current evidence. Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov 15.
- Docteur E, Berenson R. How will comparative effectiveness research affect the quality of health care? Washington, D.C.
- Garber AM, Tunis SR. Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine? N Engl J Med. 2009;360(19):1925-7.
- Giustini D. Social media trends for health librarians: a primer on using social media for clinical disease surveillance. JCHLA / JABSC. 2012;33:92-4.
- Kreis J, Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, Dickersin K. Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research. Health Expect. 2012.
- Li T, Vedula SS, Scherer R, Dickersin K. What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):367-77.
- Moat KA, Lavis JN. 10 best resources for evidence-informed health policymaking. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(2):215-218.
- Murad MH, Drake MT. Comparative effectiveness of drug treatments to prevent fragility fractures: a systematic review and network. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Mar 30.
- Oliver K, Lorenc T, Innvær S. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Jul 14;12:34.
- Peterson PN, Varosy PD. Observational comparative effectiveness research: comparative effectiveness and caveat emptor. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(2):150-2.
- Psaty BM. Conducting comparative effectiveness research on medications: the views of a practicing epidemiologist from the other washington. Value Health. 2012;15(2):394-6.
- Yu JB, Lloyd S, Decker RH, Wilson LD, Park HS. Comparative effectiveness research and the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. Curr Probl Cancer. 2012 Apr 3.