Evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP)

Core skills for the EBL information professional ~ Partridge, 2006 Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI International – hlwiki.ca? contact: dean.giustini@ubc.ca To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index. Last Update 13 May 2013 Introduction See also Assessment | Clinical librarianship | Evidence-based health care | Knowledge translation and synthesis | Research Portal for Academic Librarians What is EBLIP? " ...evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP) or evidence based librarianship (EBL) is the application of the interdisciplinary approach known as evidence-based practice (EBP) to problems in the field of library and information science (LIS)..." — Wikipedia def'n " ...evidence-based librarianship is a means to improve the profession of librarianship by asking questions as well as finding, critically appraising and incorporating research evidence from library science (and other disciplines) into daily practice. It also involves encouraging librarians to conduct high quality qualitative and quantitative research." — Crumley & Koufogiannakis, 2001 Evidence-based library and information practice (EBLIP) is the health librarian's equivalent of evidence-based medicine or evidence-based health care. Its antecedent was evidence-based librarianship which has been superceded by the slightly longer and more awkward evidence-based library and information practice. EBLIP is a set of principles that aid health librarians in making decisions in their daily work and information practices. In one of his many theoretical writings on the topic, Booth characterized EBLIP as "...an approach to information practice that promotes the collection, interpretation and integration of valid, important and applicable user-reported, practitioner-observed and research derived evidence" (2004). Health librarians use various methodologies to conduct research and to evaluate their library and information services. Their empirical research contributes to the advancement of our field and is consulted to bolster local decisions in our libraries. The endpoint for EBLIP advocates is to use more quantitative measures to manage libraries and to make decisions based on the best possible evidence whenever available. Canadian context In Canada, specifically at the University of Alberta Library, there is a hotbed of EBLIP practitioners led by those who founded the Evidence Based Library and Information Practice journal. In December 2012, it was announced on Twitter that the University of Saskatchewan passed a motion to create C-EBLIP, a centre internal to the UofS Library that will support librarians as researchers and evidence-based practitioners. EBL has been led by the American librarian Jonathan Eldredge, Briton Andrew Booth, and Canadians Denise Koufogiannakis and Ellen Crumley and latterly Lorie Kloda from McGill University Library in Montreal. In Canada, there is some skepticism about EBL especially its empiricist/positivist orientation, and whether or not it has a big place in our field. The idea that health librarians can use scientific methods and derive generalizability from scientific research is occasionally criticized behind the scenes. Detractors suggest that health librarians work within more of a qualitatively-driven field. For some, qualitative research is a better, more reliable fit with health libraries. Clearly, there is room for debate on this point. The 7th International Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Conference will be held in Saskatoon, Canada in July 2013. See http://eblip7.library.usask.ca/ EBLIP debate For a view into the debate - whether EBL is a new idea or simply a buzzword to describe what we've done all along - see the following EBLIP 2007 debate with Plutchak and Booth. My feeling is that Plutchak wins the debate but over-thinks the issues. Perhaps he took his viewpoint to an extreme to draw out differences between his position vis a vis Booth. My view is that by setting up diametrically-opposed extremes health librarians should neutralize their views by moving the entire debate to the middle ground where most of us practice and view these philosophies. This process entails making decisions based on experience and "empirical evidence" (qualitative & quantitative). I don't believe either extreme as expressed by Booth/Pultchak should be used or adopted; the EBLIP discourse and whether it's a new concept or buzzword is a sterile debate. Health librarians have always sought to improve what they do whether it's improving their management of collections, people or searching through the use of good study design and evidence-based methods. Plutchak seems to agree with that in the video. But since medicine has adopted EBM, the question arises whether health librarians should follow. Do bean counters in administration want us to use the evidence in our decision-making? I don't know any health librarians not under some kind of pressure to innovate or demonstrate and that what they are doing is a good use of resources. Innovation means being ready to do research about library services and to cumulate evidence from the literature. If a majority of health librarians believe EBLIP fits poorly with our work then we need to describe other, more nuanced views of our field. (For insight into this nuanced middle-ground see Bayley L, McKibbon A. Evidence-based librarianship: a personal perspective from the medical/nursing realm. Libr Hi Tech. 2006). Key websites Kloda L. MLA-approved course. Evidence-based librarianship in practice. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Registry of Methods and Tools: knowledge translation methods and tools for public health References Aitken EM, Powelson SE, Reaume RD, Ghali WA. Involving clinical librarians at the point of care: results of a controlled intervention. Acad Med. 2011;86(12):1508-12. Bayley L, McKibbon A. Evidence-based librarianship: a personal perspective from the medical/nursing realm. Library Hi Tech. 2006;24(3):317-323. Booth A. Using research to justify your service: cause and effect. Health Info Libr J. 2005;22(4):296-300. Booth A. Australian supermodel? a practical example of evidence-based library and information practice. Health Info Libr J. 2006;23(1):69-72. Booth A. Eleven steps to EBLIP service. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(1):81-4. Booth A, Brice A. Evidence-based practice for information professionals: a handbook, 2004. (298 p. book) Crumley E, Koufogiannakis D. Developing evidence based librarianship in Canada: six aspects for consideration. Hypothesis 2001;15:9-10. Dalrymple PW. Applying evidence in practice: what we can learn from healthcare. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2010;5(1):43-47. Doney L, Stanton W. Facilitating evidence-based librarianship: a UK experience. Health Info Libr J. 2003;20:76-78. Earl MF. Evidence-based medicine training for residents and students at a teaching hospital: the library's role in turning evidence into action. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999;87:211-14. Eldredge JD. Evidence-based librarianship: an overview. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2000;88(4):289-302. Giustini D. Evidence-based teaching for health librarians: some questions and considerations. JCHLA/JABSC. 2010;31(1):7-10. Haines M. Evidence-based practice: new opportunities for librarians. Health Libs Rev. 1994;11:221–5. Hjørland B. Evidence based practice: an analysis based on the philosophy of science. J Am Soc Info Sci Tech. 2011;62(7):1301–1310. Hutchison TP. Evidence-based anything: priorities for librarians. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship. 2007;8(2) Koufogiannakis D, Crumley E. Facilitating evidence-based librarianship: a Canadian experience. Health Info Libr J. 2003;20 Suppl 1:73-5. Koufogiannakis D. LIS systematic reviews wiki. http://lis-systematic-reviews.wikispaces.com/Welcome Lerdal SN. Evidence-based librarianship: opportunity for law librarians? Law Library Journal. 2006;98:33-60. Lewis S. Evidence based library and information practice in Australia: defining skills and knowledge. Health Info Libr J. 2011 Jun;28(2):152-5. McCarthy LH. Evidence-based medicine: an opportunity for health sciences librarians. Med Ref Serv Q. 1996;15(4):63–71. Palmer J. Schooling and skilling health librarians for an evidence-based culture. Adv Librarianship. 2000;23:145–67. Pearce-Smith N. A journal club is an effective tool for assisting librarians in the practice of evidence-based librarianship: a case study. Health Info Libr J. 2006;23(1):32-40. Rose S. Challenges and strategies in getting evidence-based practice into primary health care—what role the information professional? Health Libs Rev. 1998;15(3):165–74. Russell JS. Non-science majors gain valuable insight studying clinical trials literature: an evidence-based medicine library assignment. Adv Physiol Educ. 2004;28(1-4):188-194. Scherrer CS, Dorsch JL. The evolving role of the librarian in evidence-based medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999;87(3):322-328. Traditi LK. From both sides now: librarians' experiences at the Rocky Mountain Evidence-Based Health Care Workshop. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004;92(1):72-77. Tsafrir J, Grinberg M. Who needs evidence-based health care? Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1998;86(1):40–5. Urquhart C. Systematic reviewing, meta-analysis and meta-synthesis for evidence-based library and information science. Information Research. 2010;15(3):708. Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press; 1978. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. Yukiko S. From EBM to EBL / EBLIP. Pt.2: Evidence-based practice for their own practice by medical librarians. J Info Process Managem. 2008;51(2):105-115.