Enterprise 2.0
From HLWIKI Canada
Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI Canada - hlwiki.ca? contact: dean.giustini@ubc.ca
To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the wiki index.
IntroductionSee also Collaboration 2.0, Social media landscape & Web 2.0
Enterprise 2.0 is defined as a system of web-based technologies used for collaboration, information sharing and integration capabilities. The phrase also refers to the use of "emergent social software platforms within companies and their partners or customers". McAfee (2006) (see Andrew McAfee blog) has used "social software" to describe how "people meet, connect and collaborate through computer mediated communication and form online communities". As such, platforms are defined as "[emergent] digital environments in which contributions and interactions are widely visible and persistent over time." Emergent means the software is free to use, egalitarian and will incorporate different forms of data. However, it is important to note that Enterprise 2.0 rules out:
Strategies & policies for web 2.0Some evidence suggests that Enterprise 2.0 is the most likely outcome for the future of organizations. However, this is not to say that communication and collaboration will be wholly virtual. A lot of interpersonal communication will remain face-to-face as Pew researchers have shown (Madden and Jones, 2008). However, innovators have pointed to “tipping points” (or networking effects) as a cause of increased participation in social media. We believe that forecasts by Gartner that the effects of social computing by 2012 will be more based on volunteered data through blogs, discussion forums, wikis and the like than mandatory knowledge management and employee opinion techniques. More organizations and human resources teams should be willing to experiment with combinations of web 2.0 and enterprise 2.0. These approaches to problem-solving are not "either-or" solutions. In a quickly-changing world, some organizations are willing to experiment with social media according to the contingencies of their operations. However, this should not be surprising nor discouraged; it should be embraced. Experimentation provides a basis for dynamism and the ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competencies to address rapidly-changing environments. There is a need for organizations to develop policies on web 2.0. Whether they are simple as in the case of Microsoft (“don't write anything on blogs that would get you into trouble”) or more formal is an important issue. Let's examine advice from organizations that are more advanced in their use of social media. UK Government communications network review of social media
IBMs social computing guidelines
Reflecting on the advice from both of these sources will assist organizations to innovate using the latest social media tools. ExamplesBritish Telecom is one of the UK's biggest proponents of enterprise 2.0. It has introduced a range of social media such as a Wikipedia-type database called BTpedia, blogging and podcasting, project collaboration software and enterprise social networking. These "business tools", according to knowledge management strategist Richard Dennison, are needed because employees work more flexibly and efficiently when they use web 2.0 tools. Enterprise 2.0 has a reputation among business leaders as a time-wasting trend, something to be subverted. However, Dennison says "...we think personal information is still business information; mixing the two provides context for you as an individual, and allows people to connect and develop deeper personal relationships. Without it we're all in a one-dimensional suit". "We're trying to get away from that attitude that you have to be a different person at work." References
|

