A digital community of practice is a controversial concept Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI Canada - hlwiki.ca? contact: dean.giustini@ubc.ca
To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the wiki index.
Introduction
See also Social media, Top Social Media Websites in Medicine - 2012 and Using web 2.0 tools in health research at UBC
- " ...groups of people who come together to share and learn from one another - either face-to-face or virtually - are held together by a common interest in a body of knowledge and are driven by a desire and need to share problems, experiences, insights, templates, tools, and best practices." - What is a CoP?
A community of practice (CoP) is a term used to describe groups of people who share a deep and abiding interest in a project be it their collective vision or new directions for an organization. A CoP evolves organically due to members' interests in a set of ideas that make up a domain and may be fostered through mutual knowledge sharing. It is through a process of sharing information and experiences that learning takes place thereby making it possible to develop personally and professionally (Lave & Wenger 1991). CoPs co-exist in digital contexts using social media such as blogs, wikis and web 2.0 tools. Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger described this learning perspective in the 1990s but the practice has existed for as long as people have come together to talk, share and create things.
In 2009, Wenger, White and Smith recontextualized communities of practice for digital environments in their book Digital habitats: stewarding technology for communities. Of note in the book is the idea of "technology stewards" which recalls the importance of librarians and our work in the digital age.
Application of tools in digital CoPs
The choice of specific tools, platforms and features depends on the orientation of the community in which you find yourself. In Digital habitats nine possible community activities are identified as a way to create and promote a CoP:
- organize regular meetings
- have open-ended conversations
- work on projects
- work with content
- acquire access to expertise
- maintain relationships
- stimulate unique individual contributions
- cultivate a community
- serve a context of users (as in a library).
Seminal works
- From preface: "...participants agreed, on the whole, on four premises concerning knowledge and learning in practice":
- ...knowledge always undergoes construction and transformation in use
- ...learning is an integral aspect of activity in and with the world at all times; that learning occurs is not problematic
- ...what is learned is always complexly problematic
- ...acquisition of knowledge is not a simple matter of taking in knowledge; rather, things assumed to be natural categories, such as 'bodies of knowledge,' 'learners,' and 'cultural transmission,' require reconceptualization as cultural and social products.
Related coursework
References
- Education for a digital world 2.0. Commonwealth of learning. 2011.
- Barwick MA, Peters J. Getting to uptake: do communities of practice support the implementation of evidence-based practice? J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psych. 2009:16-29.
- Dube L, Bourhis A, Jacob R. Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdiscip J Inform Knowl Manag. 2003;3-13.
- Giustini D. Blog code(s) of conduct: some legal considerations for health librarians. JCHLA / JABSC. 2011;32:101-103.
- Giustini D. Social media for health librarians. JCHLA / JABSC. 2010;32(2):73-75.
- Ho K, Jarvis-Selinger S. Electronic communities of practice: Guidelines from a project. J Cont Ed Health Professions. 2010;30(2):139-143.
- Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning; Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
- Li LC, Grimshaw JM, Nielson CP, Judd M, Coyte PC. Evolution of Wenger’s concept of community of practice. Implement Sci. 2009;4-11.
- Li LC, Grimshaw JM, Nielson CP, Judd M, Coyte PC. Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2009;4:27.
- Murillo E. Searching for virtual communities of practice in the Usenet discussion network: combining quantitative and qualitative methods to identify the constructs of Wenger's theory. PhD thesis. University of Bradford; 2006.
- Murillo E. Searching Usenet for virtual Communities of Practice: using mixed methods to identify the constructs of Wenger's theory. Information Research. 2008;13(4)386.
- Nagy P. Building virtual communities of practice. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006;3(9):716-20.
- Wenger E, White N, Smith JD. Digital habitats: stewarding technology for communities. 2009.
- Zarb MP. Modelling participation in virtual communities-of-practice. LSE MSc Dissertation; 2006.
|