Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI International? contact Using clickers (CCSs) during lectures
To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index.
- 20 May 2017
See also Clicker technology in workshops | Information technology topics | Social media in undergraduate medical education | Teaching library users
Clicker systems (also called audience response systems and classroom communication systems (CCSs)) are a combination of handheld remote devices, receivers and software that allow students to send responses (typically multiple-choice) to a computer which are collected and tabulated in real-time. Clicker technology allows every student to answer without the fear of humiliation or negative attention. When using student response systems, every student can share their input without embarrassment rather than allowing one or two eager students to dominate discussions. Responses are transmitted wirelessly to a receiver attached to a computer and tabulated by its software. CCSs also include shared display of results. The main benefit of clicker technology in classroom is the potential to increase interactivity with the students. Those students who are more engaged during class have been found to be better students; recent research shows that increasing the peer-to-peer and student-teacher interaction improves learning and course effectiveness (Hake, Mazur, etc.). Some specific applications or strategies using clickers include:
- question and answer formats
- unit reviewing
- collaborative work (pairs, groups)
- debating points or issues
- voting and peer evaluation
- data collection (survey, statistical analyses)
- customized instruction (based on understanding)
- informal assessment
Library science & information literacy
- Campbell J, Mayer RE. Questioning as an instructional method: does it affect learning from lectures? Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2009;23(6):747-759.
- Cleary AM. Using wireless response systems to replicate behavioral research findings in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology. 2008;35(1):42-44.
- Edens KM. The interaction of pedagogical approach, gender, self-regulation, and goal orientation using student response system technology. J Res Tech Educ. 2009;41(2):161-177.
- Epstein ML. Immediate feedback assessment technique promotes learning and corrects inaccurate first responses. Psychological Record. 2002;52(2):187-201.
- Fisher CM. Automated classroom response systems: Implications for sexuality education and research. Am J Sexuality Educ. 2006;1(4):23-31.
- Glass AL. Combined online and in-class pretesting improves exam performance in general psychology. Ed Psych. 2008;28(5), 483-503.
- Kellum KK. Response-card instruction and student learning in a college classroom. Teaching of Psychology. 2001;28(2):101-104.
- Langley MM. On the use of wireless response systems in experimental psychology: implications for the behavioral researcher. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(4):816-823.
- Lee JB. Do clickers depersonalize the classroom? An evaluation by shy students. Annual Convention of the Western Psychological Association, Palm Springs, CA; 2006.
- Mayer RE. Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2009;34:51-57.
- Morling B. Efficacy of personal response systems ("clickers") in large, introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology. 2008;35(1):45-50.
- Poirier CR. Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology. 2007;34(3), 194-196.
- Shaffer DM. Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology. 2009;36(4), 273-277.
- Stowell JR. Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology. 2007;34(4), 253-258.