Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI International? contact Importing citations into RefWorks
To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index.
- 1 April 2014
See also Bibliographic citation software | Mendeley | Research Portal for Academic Librarians | RefWorks | Style manuals for writers & editors | Zotero
Citation management refers to a range of methods (and software) used to manage your citations and research articles. The three main stages of citation management are retrieval, organization and formatting of bibliographic references for books, journal articles, digital learning objects and websites; similarly, inputting, managing and outputting citations (as bibliographies or footnotes) are three activities common to most citation management tools. A number of tools accomplish citation management, some of which are free and others such as EndNote and ProCite which are fee-based. One of the core skills in citation management is formatting references according to an appropriate style sheet. Most citation managers are designed to organized citations into specific bibliographic formats. As an important part of overall information management, citation management software is used to prepare manuscripts, organize reprints, newspaper clippings, books, audiovisual materials, maps and other materials. RefWorks is widely-used in Canadian and American universities by faculty, staff and students but so are digital-age tools such as Mendeley and Zotero. One of the benefits of using RefWorks is the librarian support you can get from your local university library. Other reference managers may be used but they may not be supported. Academic librarians who promote and provide technical support for citation management programs should be aware of the strengths and potential problems that users will face in using these tools. Keep in mind that Google scholar provides bi-directional functionality for downloading citations into citation management tools but does not accommodate bulk downloads.
Some free web 2.0 tools
Most of these tools are free to use on the web, unless you require a premium version.
- ...web-based journal article app designed for researchers in bioinformatics, engineering, information management; combines citation management, RSS readers & document ordering
- ...a reference management and knowledge organization service used in the German-speaking world (although there is an English version). It helps to find, structure and document resources within a single interface. WorldCat is another online catalogue Citavi users can search, cite and make annotations to help in research and writing process
Citation management (CM) is the key to keeping track of your research activities and for creating lists of references for peer-reviewed papers. CM is essential for customization of your bibliographies if you submit papers to a number of different scholarly journals. In academic institutions, RefWorks is very popular but other free tools such as Zotero and Mendeley are increasingly used.
RefWorks is relatively simple to use, and researchers can use an aspect of the software called RefShare. Like other web-based reference tools, RefWorks lets you gather, store, manage, and share references or citations, and generate bibliographies and formatted papers. References are stored online, and are easily accessible from any web-connected computer. Citation management tools may also be useful in Citation analysis studies or any research where managing large numbers of references is a central activity.
Some health librarians have expressed concerns about using American web-hosted citation management software, such as RefWorks and EndNote Web, because any information stored in these tools falls under the US Patriot Act, and is therefore subject to scrutiny by authorities. However, this possible invasion of privacy is not deemed severe enough not to use the software.
- Borgman CL, Furner J. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Ann Rev Info Sci Tech. 2002;36:2–72.
- Childress D. Citation tools in academic libraries: best practices for reference and instruction. Ref User Serv Q. 2011;51(2):143-152.
- Cronin B. Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. J Information Science. 2001;27(1):1–7.
- Fitzpatrick RB. ISI’s Journal citation reports on the web. Med Ref Serv Q. 2003;22(4):45–56.
- Gisvold SE. Citation analysis and journal impact factors – is the tail wagging the dog? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43:971–973.
- Glassman NR, Sorensen K. Citation management. J Elec Res Med Libr. 2012;9(3):223–231.
- Gomis M, Gall C, Brahmi FA. Web-based citation management compared to EndNote: options for medical sciences. Med Ref Serv Q. 2008;27(3):260–71.
- Hensley MK. Citation management software: features and futures. Ref User Serv Q. 2011;50(3):204–208.
- Ingwersen P. The calculation of web impact factors. J Document. 1998;54(2):236–43.
- Kilic Z, Yu CH, Jannasch-Pennell A, DiGangi S. Accessing our research bibliographies online: better or just different? Educause. 2006
- Lawrence S. Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature. 2001;411(6837):521.
- Lo Russo G, Spolveri F, Ciancio F, Mori A. Mendeley: an easy way to manage, share, and synchronize papers and citations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jun;131(6):946e-947e.
- Mahajan AK, Hogarth DK. Taking control of your digital library: how modern citation managers do more than just referencing. Chest. 2013;144(6):1930-3.
- Marsalis S, Kelly J. Building a RefWorks database of faculty publications as a liaison and collection development tool. Issues Sci Tech Librarian. 2004;40
- Mead TL, Berryman DR. Reference and PDF-manager software: complexities, support and workflow. Med Ref Serv Q. 2010;29(4):388–93.
- Neufeld E, Barsky E. Reviews of science for science librarians: BibTeX. Science & Technology Libraries. 16 Sept 2013.
- Nisonger TE. Citation autobiography: an investigation of ISI database coverage in determining author citedness. Coll Res Libr. 2004;65(2):152–163.
- Ouellette D. Subject guides in academic libraries: a user-centred study of uses and perceptions/Les guides par sujets dans les bibliothèques académiques: une étude des utilisations et des perceptions centrée sur l'utilisateur. Can J Info Libr Science. 2011;35(4):436–451.
- Sims JL, McGhee CNJ. Citation analysis and journal impact factors in ophthalmology and vision science journals. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31:14–22.
- Singh J. Mendeley: a free research management tool for desktop and web. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1(1):62–3.
- Smith R. Journal accused of manipulating Impact Factor. BMJ. 1997;314:461.
- Steeleworthy M, Dewan PT. Web-based citation management systems: which one is best?. Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research. 2013;8(1).
- Yorke-Barber P, Ghiculescu C, Possin G. RefWorks in three steps: undergraduate team bibliographies. Issues Sci Tech Librarian. 2009
- Zhang Y. Comparison of select reference management tools. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31(1):45–60.