Bibliography - Library 2.0

Introduction

See also LIBR 559M - Course Resources, Library 2.0 Chronology & Subject librarian 2.0

This is a growing dynamic list of scholarly articles about Library 2.0 from 2003 to 2011. The phrase was coined by Michael Casey on LibraryCrunch blog in 2005 though concepts that make up "Library 2.0" emerged as early as 2003. The term is a spinoff of "web 2.0", popularized by O'Reilly Media.

What is Library 2.0?

see also Other Library 2.0 Definitions

• "The principles of Library 2.0 seek to put users in touch with information and entertainment wherever they may be, breaking down the barriers of space, time and outdated policy. It is a user-centered paradigm focusing on knowledge, experience, collaboration, the creation of new content and encouraging the heart." - Michael Stephens Tame the Web

2011

• Nesta, F., Mi, J. (2011). Library 2.0 or Library III: returning to leadership. Library Management, Vol. 32 Iss: 1/2, pp.85 - 97
• Partridge H., Lee, J., Munro, C. Becoming "Librarian 2.0": The Skills, Knowledge, and Attributes Required by Library and Information Science Professionals in a Web 2.0 World (and Beyond). Library Trends. 59, 1-2, Summer 2010/Fall 2010, pp. 315-335
• Sidorko, P.E. (2011). Searching 2.0. Library Management, Vol. 32 Iss: 1/2, pp.135 - 137
• Jesus Serrano-Guerrero, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Jose A. Olivas, Andres Cerezo, Francisco P. Romero, A google wave-based fuzzy recommender system to disseminate information in University Digital Libraries 2.0, Information Sciences, Volume 181, Issue 9, 1 May 2011, Pages 1503-1516

2010

• Arch, X. (2010). The Ultimate Debate 2009: Has Library 2.0 Fulfilled Its Promise? A Report of the Library and Information Technology Association Internet Resources and Services Interest Group Program, American Library Association Annual Conference, Chicago, July 2009. Technical Services Quarterly, 27(4), 369-371.
• Brantley, J. S. (2010). Exploring Library 2.0 on the Social Web. Journal of Web Librarianship, 4(4), 351-374.
• Carpan, C. (2010). Introducing Information Literacy 2.0. College & Undergraduate Libraries (17)1:106.
• Fredrick, K. (2010). In the Driver's Seat: Learning and Library 2.0 Tools. School Library Monthly. 26(6):34-5.
• Han, Z., Liu, YQ. (2010). Web 2.0 Applications in Top Chinese University Libraries. Library Hi Tech, 28(1),41-62.
• Harinarayana, N.S., Vasantha Raju N. (2010). Web 2.0 features in university library web sites. Electronic Library 28(1):69-88.
• Kim, Y.,Abbas, J. (2010). Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users: A Knowledge Management Perspective. J Acad Libr, 36(3), 211-18.
• Luo, L. (2010). Web 2.0 Integration in Information Literacy Instruction: An Overview. J Acad Libr, 36(1), 32-40.
• O'Dell, S. (2010). Opportunities and Obligations for Libraries in a Social Networking Age: A Survey of Web 2.0 and Networking Sites. J Acad Libr, 50(3), 237-251.
• Partridge H, Lee J, Munro C. (2010). Becoming "Librarian 2.0": the skills, knowledge, and attributes required by library and information science professionals in a web 2.0 world (and beyond). Library Trends 59(1-2)315-335.
• Pradhan D, Panighahi P. Library 2.0 research paper. Emerging as the New Generation Interactive Library Service. Tezpur University, Assam February 18-20, 2010.
• Spiranec, S. Zorica, M.B. (2010). Information Literacy 2.0: hype or discourse refinement? Journal of Documentation 66(1):
• Kim, JM, Abbas, J. (2010). Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users: A Knowledge Management Perspective, J Acad Libr, 36, 3, 211-218.
• Weman, M. (2010). Library 2.0 - crossing or burning bridges over the digital divide? Swedish School of Library and Information Science. University of Borås, Sweden January 2010.
• Zanin-Yost, A. (2010). Library 2.0: Blogs, Wikis, and RSS to Serve the Library. Library Philosophy & Practice, 12(2), 1-4.

2009

• Aharony, N. (2009). Web 2.0 use by librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 31, 1, 29-37.
• Dora, M. and Maharana, B. 2008.“A-Lib 2.0: new avatar academic libraries with Web 2.0 applications”, 6th Int CALIBER, February and March, 2008, University of Allahabad.
• Carpenter, M.,Green R.A. (2009). Managing Library 2.0. Journal of Access Services, 6, 1, 158-162.
• Harland, P. (2009). Library 2.0 in Plymouth, New Hampshire: how one library uses web 2.0 tools to enhance services to students & staff. Library Media Connection, 27, 5, 57-8.
• Hendrix, D. (2009) Use of Facebook in academic health sciences libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 97, 1, 44-7.
• Murphy J. Social Networking Literacy Competencies for Librarians: Exploring Considerations and Engaging Participation. Contributed Paper, ACRL 14th National Conference, Pushing the Edge: Explore, Engage, Extend. March 14, 2009.
• Sodt, J.M., Summey T.P. (2009). Beyond the library's walls: using library 2.0 tools to reach out to all users. Journal of Library Administration, 49, 1, 97–109.
• Srinivasan, R., et al (2009). Blobgects: digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities. JASIST, 60, 4, 666-78.
• Titangos, HL. H. & Mason, G. L. (2009). Learning library 2.0: 23 things @SCPL. Library Management, 30, 1/2, 44-56.
• Wang, S., Zheng, Q. (2009). Programming library 2.0 that users need. The Electronic Library, 27, 2, 292-297.

2008

• Aharony, N. (2008). Web 2.0 in U.S. LIS schools: are they missing the boat?. Ariadne 54

• Alsbjer, P. (2008). Interaction: anything goes 2.0. In Scandinavian Public Library Quarterly, 41 2, 6-9.

• Bailey, S. (2008). Managing the crowd: rethinking records management for the web 2.0 world. London: Facet.

• Bradley, P. (2008). A selection of social media search engines. Ariadne, 57.

• Bridges, K. (2008). Librarians and the attention economy. Library Philosophy and Practice.

• Bullen, A. (2008). The 'long tale': using web 2.0 concepts to enhance digital collections. Computers in libraries, 28, 9, 31-35.

• Gross, J. & Leslie, L. (2008). Twenty-three steps to learning web 2.0 technologies in an academic library. The Electronic Library, 26, 6, 790-802.

• Habib M. (2008). Toward academic library 2.0: development and application of a library 2.0 methodology.

• Murley, D. (2008). What is all the fuss about Library 2.0? Law Library Journal, 100. 1, 197-204.

• Reichardt, R. (2008). How may I help thee? Let me count the 2.0 ways. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 13, 2/3, 271-280.

• Secker, J. (2008). Social software and libraries: a literature review from the LASSIE project. Program: electronic library and information systems, 4, 3, 215-231.

2007

• Casey, M., Savastinuk, L. (2007). Library 2.0: a guide to participatory library service, Information Today Press.

• Courtney, Nancy. Library 2.0 and Beyond: Innovative Technologies and Tomorrow's User, Libraries Unlimited, 2007.

• Bradley P. How to use web 2.0 in your library. London: Facet, 2007.

• Braun LW. Listen Up! Podcasting for Schools and Libraries. Medford: Information today, 2007.

• Crawford W. Public Library Blogs. 252 Examples. Scotts Valley: CreateSpace, 2007.

• Farkas, M. Social software in libraries: building collaboration, communication, and community online. Medford: Infotoday, 2007.

• Kroski E. Web 2.0 for librarians and information professionals. New York: Neal-Schuman, 2007.

• Levine, J. (2007). Getting Your Game On. American Libraries.

• Parkes, D.H. Web 2.0 and libraries: impacts, technologies and trends. Oxford: Chandos, 2007.

• Rigby, B. Mobilizing Generation 2.0: a practical guide to using web 2.0. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008.

• Stephens, M., Collins, M. (2007). Web 2.0, library 2.0, and the hyperlinked library. Serials Review, 33, 4, 253-256.

2006

• Abram, Stephen. "Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and Librarian 2.0: Preparing for the 2.0 World." SirsiDynix One Source. (2) 1, 2006. http://www.imakenews.com/sirsi/e_article000505688.cfm?x=b6yRqLJ,b2rpQhRM
  • We must prepare for Librarian 2.0. We have the insight and knowledge to influence this trend for the future of our profession.

• Blyberg, J. (2006). 11 reasons why Library 2.0 Exists and Matters. Retrieved from http://www.blyberg.net/2006/01/09/11-reasons-why-library-20-exists-and-matters/

• Brevik, T. Library computer security 2.0? Librarian 1.5
  • It is great we are waving the Library 2.0 flag, but we have to document security problems that go with it or IT folks will take the blame for problems that arise.

• Casey, M. E. & Savastinuk L. C. (2006). Library 2.0: Service for the Next-Generation Library. Library Journal, 131, 14, 40-42.

• Chowdhury, G., Poulter, A., McMenemy, D. (2006). Public library 2.0: towards a new mission for public libraries as a 'network of community knowledge'. Online Information Review, 30, 4, 454-460.

• Crawford, Walt. (2006). Library 2.0 and 'Library 2.0.' Cites and Insights, 6, 2. Retrieved from http://cites.boisestate.edu/v6i2a.htm

• Eash, E. (2006). Podcasting 101. Computers in Libraries, 16-20.

• Harris, C. (2006) School Library 2.0. Retrieved from http://schoolof.info/infomancy/?p=129

• Levine, J. (2006). Library 2.0 in the Real World. Retrieved from http://www.techsource.ala.org/blog/2006/01/library-20-in-the-real-world.html

• LIS wiki (2006). Retrieved from http://liswiki.org/wiki/Library_2.0

• Litwin, R. The Central Problem of Library 2.0: Privacy. Library Juice
  • As serious as privacy concerns are, the features of web 2.0 depend on users sharing private information with others. This presents a problem in offering Library 2.0 services. If we value reader privacy, it’s clear our experiments with Library 2.0 services will have some limitations.

• Maness, J. (2006). Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries. Webology, 3, 2, 25.
  • This article posits theory for "Library 2.0", a new paradigm for librarians. The paper addresses how web 2.0 tools such as synchronous messaging, streaming media, blogs, wikis, social networks, tagging, RSS feeds, and mashups will change how libraries provide access to their collections.

• Maness, J. (2006). Library 2.0: The next generation of web-based library services. LOGOS: Journal of the World Book Community, 17, 3, 139-145.

• Miller, P. (2006). Library 2.0: the challenge of disruptive. Innovation, Talis.

• Notess, G. (2006). The terrible twos: web 2.0, library 2.0, and more. Information Today, 30, 3. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/online/may06/OnTheNet.shtml

• Sauers MP.(2006). Blogging and RSS: a librarian's guide. Medford: Information Today. Retrieved from http://www.travelinlibrarian.info/writing/blogging&rss/

• School Library Journal. A Book Lover’s MySpace. Retrieved from http://www.schoollibraryjournal.com/article/CA6376092.html

• Stephens, M. (2006) Into a new world of librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/nextspace/002/3.htm
  • One of the principles Stephens would add to Library 2.0 is "the Library is human". Librarian 2.0 is a strategy for helping users find information; the most important traits are: (1) plans for users; (2) embraces Web 2.0; (3) controls technolust; (4) makes good, yet fast decisions; (5) a trendspotter; and (6) gets content.

• Stephens, M. (2006). Tech tips for every librarian: Flickr & lLibraries. Computers in Libraries.

• Stephens, M. (2006). Web 2.0 & Libraries: Best Practices for Social Software, Library Technology Reports, 42, 4.

• Stephens M. Web 2.0 and libraries: best practices for social software. Chicago: American Library Association, 2006.

2005

• Anderson, C. (2005) The Long tail. Wired Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html

• Balas, J. (2005). Blogging is so last year now podcasting is hot. Computers in Libraries, 29-31.

• Boog, J. (2005). Library 2.0 movement sees benefits in collaboration with patrons. Retrieved from http://www.publish.com/article2/0,1895,1881893,00.asp
  • One of the first articles to use the phrase "Library 2.0". 100 library professionals speculating about how to survive in a world of web-based, user-created content.

• Chad, K. & Miller, P. (2005). Do libraries matter? Retrieved from http://www.talis.com/downloads/white_papers/DoLibrariesMatter.pdf

• Curran, K., Murray, M. & Christian, M. (2007). Taking the information to the public through library 2.0. Library Hi Tech, 25, 2, 288-297.

• Fichter, D. (2005). The many forms of e-collaboration: Blogs, wikis, portals, groupware, discussion boards, and instant messaging. Online, 29, 4, 48-50.

• Fichter, D. Why and how to use blogs to promote your library's services. Retrieved from http://www.infotoday.com/mls/nov03/fichter.shtml

• Houghton, S. & Schmidt, A. (2005). Web-based chat vs. instant messaging. Online, 29, 4, 26-30.

• Miller, P., (2005). Web 2.0 building the new library. Ariadne, 45. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/

• Miller, P., Chad, K. (2005). Do libraries matter? - The rise of Library 2.0, Talis.

• O’Reilly, T. (2005) What is Web 2.0? Retrieved from http://tim.oreilly.com/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html

• Roush, W. (2005). Social machines. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/14664/

• Schmidt, A. & Stephens, M. IM me. Library Journal, Retrieved from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA512192

• Steinkuehler, C. (2005). Meet the gamers. Library Journal, Retrieved from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA516033.html

• Tierdaman, D. (2005). Folksonomies Tap people Power. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66456,00.html

• Tonkin, E. (2005). Making the case for a wiki. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue42/tonkin/

2004

• Fichter, D. (2004). Using RSS to create new services. Online, 28, 4, 52-55.

• Garrod, P. (2004). Weblogs: Do they belong in libraries. Retrieved from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue40/public-libraries/

• Hale, K. (2004). The importance of RSS. Retrieved from http://particletree.com/features/the-importance-of-rss

• Hammond, T. et al. (2005). Social bookmarking tools (I) a general review. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html

• Shiu, E., & Lenhart, A. (2004). How Americans use instant messaging. Washington D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project.

2003

• Henri, F., Pudelko, B. (2003). Understanding and analyzing activity and learning in virtual communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 474-487.
• Tennant, R. (2003). Feed your head: keeping up by using RSS. Library Journal, 128, 9, 30.