Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI International? contact Academic librarians share their research in a series
To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index.
This entry is out of date, and will not be updated, June 2017
See also Applying for grants | ePortfolio | Personal learning plans (PLPs) | Research Portal for Academic Librarians
Applying for a sabbatical is an important scholarly benefit enjoyed by academic librarians undertaking specific research and/or academic projects for six- and twelve-month sabbaticals. The purpose of the sabbatical is not to rest but to shore up one's intellectual energies by pursuing additional professional development. Some other reasons include enabling academic librarians to stay current in emerging technologies, or to enhance one's effectiveness as a librarian within the academy. In other words, a sabbatical is generally undertaken by a seasoned academic librarian to pursue a project and/or course of study that will benefit the host institution. Whether short or long in duration, a sabbatical should be linked directly to the role(s) of academic librarians within their institutions.
Typically, a sabbatical will last anywhere from six months to a year. As faculty members, most academic librarians earn the right to take a year-long sabbatical after serving "X number of years" of service in their organizations. Some examples of recent sabbatical projects include completing a subject master's degree, conducting research into specific library issues and working on specific research projects. In most academic institutions, academic librarians must serve from between four to seven full-time years to qualify for the sabbatical. Some library organizations do not provide a sabbatical benefit to their librarians at all.
Ganshorn (2010) argues that librarians must be more accountable for demonstrating how their sabbaticals add institutional value and in meeting their goals for their sabbaticals. Ganshorn conducted her study while on sabbatical herself, and provided examples of how academic librarians can create manageable research projects that link academic rigour to something of personal value.
- Ashcroft L, McIvor, S. LIS research and publishing: the forces of change. Libr Rev. 2000;49(9):461-469.
- Association of College and Research Libraries Task Force on Institutional Priorities and Faculty Rewards. Academic librarianship and the redefining scholarship project, 1998.
- Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2000.
- Bruce C. Faculty-librarian partnerships in Australian higher education: critical dimensions. Ref Serv Rev. 2001;29(2):106-116.
- Christiansen L, Stombler M, Thaxton L. A report on librarian-faculty relations from a sociological perspective. J Acad Librarian. 2004;30(2):116-121.
- Flaspohler MR. Librarian sabbatical leaves: do we need to get out more? J Acad Librarian. 2009;35(2):152-161..
- Ganshorn H. Sabbatical options for academic librarians in the US vary widely. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2010;5(2):93-96.
- Gerding SK, MacKellar PH. Grants for libraries: a how-to-do-it manual. New York: Neal-Schuman, 2006.
- Iverson L. Report on eLibrary@UBC 4: research, collaboration and the digital library - visions for 2010. D-Lib Magazine. 2002;8(12).
- Lougee WP. Diffuse libraries: emergent roles for the research library in the digital age. In: Perspectives on the evolving library. Council on Library and Information Resources; 2002.
- Neal JG. The research and development imperative in the academic library: path to the future. Portal. 2006;6(1):1-3.
- St Clair G, Miller R, Fiander PM. Academic librarianship and the redefining scholarship project. Serials Librarian. 2000;38:63-67.
- Stelle V, Elder SD. Becoming a fundraiser : the principles and practice of library development. Chicago: American Library Association, 2000.
- University of Toronto. Writing in the health sciences: a comprehensive guide, 2009.